Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 08:47
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
What’s next?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Deion Sanders gives update on health issues that have kept him home - New York Post
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
'Call of Duty: Black Ops 7' to Star Milo Ventimiglia, Kiernan Shipka - Variety
Let’s just make it real clear:
Thank you.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Why do I want to give up on men?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Steam is finally adding native support for Macs with Apple Silicon - The Verge
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Why do people say "tall, dark, and handsome" when they actually mean "tall, white, and handsome"?
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Russia can stop this any time.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Miley declines to address accusations in court documents about death of Tyler Skaggs - AP News